切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华胃肠内镜电子杂志

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 1 -6. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2019.01.001

所属专题： 文献；

论著

冷圈套联合黏膜下注射对结直肠(微)小息肉的完整切除率的研究
谢娇1, 王雯2,†(), 李达周2, 叶舟2, 许斌斌2, 徐桂林2, 洪东贵2, 曾茹娇2   
  1. 1. 350025　福州，厦门大学附属东方医院；350025　福州，解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院消化内科
    2. 350025　福州，解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-31 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 通信作者: 王雯
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划(2105BA13B08); 福建医科大学起航(2017XQ1197)

Complete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy with injection(CSPI) for diminutive and small colorectal polyps

Jiao Xie1, Wen Wang2,†(), Dazhou Li2, Zhou Ye2, Binbin Xu2, Guilin Xu2, Donggui Hong2, Rujiao Zeng2   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology.Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University；900 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
    2. 900 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
  • Received:2018-12-31 Published:2019-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Wen Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Wen, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

谢娇, 王雯, 李达周, 叶舟, 许斌斌, 徐桂林, 洪东贵, 曾茹娇. 冷圈套联合黏膜下注射对结直肠(微)小息肉的完整切除率的研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2019, 06(01): 1-6.

Jiao Xie, Wen Wang, Dazhou Li, Zhou Ye, Binbin Xu, Guilin Xu, Donggui Hong, Rujiao Zeng. Complete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy with injection(CSPI) for diminutive and small colorectal polyps[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2019, 06(01): 1-6.

目的

肠镜下切除的结直肠息肉绝大多数为微小息肉(≤5 mm)或小息肉(6～10 mm)，对于此类息肉的最佳切除方法目前缺乏统一指南。本研究旨在探究冷圈套息肉切除术联合黏膜下注射治疗结直肠息肉(直径≤10 mm)的可行性和有效性。

方法

本研究前瞻性随机选取2018年1月至2018年12月经解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院消化内科行结肠镜检查发现结直肠息肉(直径≤10 mm)的300例患者进行对照研究，按1∶1随机分配接受冷圈套息肉切除术联合黏膜下注射(CSPI)或冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)治疗。其中CSPI组在切除息肉之前先进行黏膜下注射，再行息肉切除，而CSP组则套取息肉后直接切除，然后在内镜窄带成像技术(NBI)引导下对息肉切除部位底部及侧切缘活检2～3块，用于病理组织学评估切除完整率。术中记录息肉切除时间、息肉回收情况和并发症。

结果

纳入研究的300例患者，CSPI组(n ＝150)和CSP组(n＝150)病灶平均大小分别为7.7 mm和6.7 mm。患者的性别、年龄等及息肉部位、大小、形态、分型在组间均衡。CSPI与CSP相比完全切除率为96.7% vs 76.6%，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。所有息肉均回收，其中9例CSP患者出现术中出血，CSPI组无术中出血，差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)；所有患者均无迟发性出血、穿孔等并发症。

结论

尽管CSPI较单纯采用冷圈套的治疗时间长，但却是一种安全、有效的息肉切除术，尤其对于6～10 mm息肉其全切除率高达98.9%，并且手术相关并发症发生率较低。

关键词: 结直肠息肉, 冷圈套息肉切除术, 黏膜下注射, 全切除率, 并发症
Objective

The majority of polyps removed at colonoscopy are diminutive (≤ 5 mm) to small(6-10 mm) and there are few guidelines for the best way for these polyps to be removed. We aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of cold snare polypectomy with injection(CSPI) for polyps ≤10 mm.

Methods

This study prospectively and randomly selected 300 patients with colorectal polyps (diameter ≤ 10 mm) found by colonoscopy in the gastroenterology department of 900 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team from January 2018 to December 2018 for a control study, candidates were randomized (1∶1)to be treated with either cold snare polypectomy with injection(CSPI) or cold snare polypectomy(CSP). A small submucosal injection was administered prior to removal of the polyp using cold snare in the CSPI, whlie not in CSP.After polypectomy, an additional 2-3 forceps biopsies under narrow-band imaging (NBI) were performed at the base and margins of polypectomy sites to assess completeness of resection. Polypectomy timing, retrieval and complications were recorded at the time of the procedure.

Results

Three hundred patients were recruited with mean lesion size of polyps 7.7 mm in CSPI group(n=150) and 6.7 mm in CSP group(n=150). The patients′ baseline characteristics and the location, size and shape of polyps removed were similar between the 2 groups.The complete resection rate (CRR) was respectively with CSPI and CSP 96.7% vs.76.6%, (P<0.001), there was significant difference between the two groups.Retrieval was completed for all polyps.Immediate bleeding during the procedure was more common in CSP has 9 cases , but no occurred in CSPI group (P<0.05), the difference was statistically significant, and there were no delayed bleeding or delayed perforation after polypectomy.

Conclusions

Cold snare polypectomy with injection is a safe and effective technique for polyps, with a high complete resection especially for 6-10 mm polyps reach to 98.9%, and low procedure-related adverse events, but the time taken for the procedure is greater than cold snare.

Key words: Colorectal Polyps, Cold snare polypectomy, Submucosal injection, Complete resection rates, Procedure-related adverse events
图2 (A-E)CSP
图1 (A-E)CSP联合黏膜下注射
表1 CSP和CSPI组患者及息肉切除一般情况
组别 性别 年龄(岁) 肠道准备评分(分)(BBPS评分) 息肉切除时间(min) 息肉回收率(%) 回盲部插管率(%)
男 女
CSP(n＝150) 78 72 60.72±7.3 7.7±2.11 3.24±1.05 100 97.14
CSPI(n＝150) 81 69 62.13±6.8 7.5±2.28 3.45±1.12 100 94.29
P值 0.919 0.084 0.431 0.095 － 0.748
表2 切除息肉一般情况
组别 大小(mm) 部位 形态(巴黎分型) NICE分型
左半结肠 横结肠 右半结肠 Ip Is Isp 增生性息肉 腺瘤 腺癌
CSP(n＝150) 6.78±2.23 42 75 33 32 55 63 71 78 1
CSPI(n＝150) 7.72±1.87 39 66 45 41 57 52 59 85 2
P值 0.071 0.282 0.333 0.574
表3 CSP和CSPI组息肉切除治疗情况
组别 内镜下整块切除率(%) 组织学完全切除率(%) 不同大小息肉切除率 标本含黏膜下层率(%) 术中 术后2周(迟发性)
1～5 mm 6～10 mm 出血 穿孔 出血 穿孔
CSP(n＝150) 100 76.6(115/150) 72.1(44/61) 79.8(71/89) 59.3(89/150) 9 0 0 0
CSPI(n＝150) 100 96.7(145/150) 93.2(55/59) 98.9(90/91) 84.7(127/150) 0 0 0 0
P值 － <0.001 0.005 <0.001 <0.001 0.003 － － －
[1]
Shaukat A, Mongin SJ, Geisser MS, et al.Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(12): 1106-1114.
[2]
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, Brien MJ, et al.Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 67(8): 687-696.
[3]
Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, et al.Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study[J]. Endoscopy, 2017, 49(3): 251-257.
[4]
Pohl H, Robertson DJ.Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010, 8(10): 858-864.
[5]
Tsai FC, Strum WB.Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size[J]. Digest Dis Scie, 2011, 56(8): 2384-2388.
[6]
Carter D, Beer-Gabel M, Zbar A, et al. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practice amongst Israeli gastroenterologists[J]. Ann Gastroenterol, 2013, 26(2): 135-140.
[7]
Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK.A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2004, 60(3): 414-418
[8]
Chandran S, Parker F, Vaughan R, et al.The current practice standard for colonoscopy in Australia[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2014, 79(3): 473-479.
[9]
Park SK, Ko BM, Han JP, et al.A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2016, 83(3): 527-532.
[10]
Efthymiou M, Taylor AC, Desmond PV, et al.Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps[J]. Endoscopy, 2011, 43(4): 312-316.
[11]
Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al.Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline[J]. Endoscopy, 2017, 49(3): 270-297.
[12]
Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Matsuura N, et al.Feasibility of cold snare polypectomy in Japan: a pilot study[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 7(17): 1250-1256.
[13]
Zhang Q, Gao P, Han B, et al.Polypectomy for the complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2018, 87(3): 733-740.
[14]
Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG, et al.Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 78(4): 625-632.
[15]
Abe Y, Nabeta H, Koyanagi R, et al.Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2018, 6(2): E254-E258.
[16]
David J, Halim A, Farzan F, et al.BahinWide-field piecemeal cold snare polypectomy of large sessile serrated polyps without a submucosal injection is safe[J]. Endoscopy, 2018, 50(3): 248-252.
[17]
O′Connor SA, Brooklyn TN, Dunckley PD, et al.High complete resection rate for prelift and cold biopsy of diminutive colorectal polyps[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2018, 6(2): E173-E178.
[18]
Tachikawa J, Chiba H, Kuwabara H, et al.Successful 2-channel cold snare polypectomy of a colorectal lesion involving the appendiceal orifice[J]. Video GIE, 2018, 3(9): 279-280.
[19]
Jung YS, Park JH, Kim HJ, et al.Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps[J]. Endoscopy, 2013, 45(12): 1024-1029.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号