切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 51 -56. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2021.02.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术术中出血分级评估及相关因素分析
丁樑1, 陈伟2, 俞静华2, 章粉明2, 许国强2,()   
  1. 1. 310000 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院消化内科;312000 绍兴,绍兴市人民医院(浙江大学绍兴医院)消化内科
    2. 310000 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-24 出版日期:2021-05-15
  • 通信作者: 许国强
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医学重点学科(G3222)

Evaluation of intraoperative bleeding grading and related factors of ESD treatment for early gastric cancer

Liang Ding1, Wei Chen2, Jinghua Yu2, Fenming Zhang2, Guoqiang Xu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Shaoxing People′s Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Hangzhou 312000, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China
  • Received:2020-09-24 Published:2021-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Guoqiang Xu
引用本文:

丁樑, 陈伟, 俞静华, 章粉明, 许国强. 早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术术中出血分级评估及相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 51-56.

Liang Ding, Wei Chen, Jinghua Yu, Fenming Zhang, Guoqiang Xu. Evaluation of intraoperative bleeding grading and related factors of ESD treatment for early gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2021, 08(02): 51-56.

目的

评估早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)术中出血的分级及意义,并探究与术中出血分级相关的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2018年12月经浙江大学附属第一医院消化内镜中心行ESD治疗,并具有早期胃癌诊断依据的病例资料。根据术中止血方式对病例进行术中出血分级(J0-3),评估ESD术中出血特点,比较J0-2组与J3组组间ESD完成情况的差异,采用Logistic回归模型分析J3发生的相关因素。

结果

共纳入231例患者,J0-2病例占83.1%;J3组有3例患者未完成ESD操作,J0-2组无未完成ESD病例。相对J0-2组,J3组患者完整切除率低(52.8% vs 86.5%,P<0.01),追加手术率高(25% vs 10.9%, P=0.03)。单因素Logistic回归分析显示,胃角、胃体、贲门-胃底病灶,浸润达黏膜肌层及以下,病理类型为中-低分化癌是J3发生的高危因素。多因素Logistic回归显示,胃角、胃体、贲门-胃底病灶是J3发生的独立预测因素。

结论

ESD治疗早期胃癌术中出血方式分级通常为J0-2级;当术中出血分级达J3时会降低ESD完整切除率,增加追加手术率;非胃窦部位病灶是J3发生的独立预测因素。

Objective

To evaluate the intraoperative bleeding grading, significance and probe the risk factors of ESD treatment for early gastric cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on data of early gastric cancer cases that underwent ESD at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from January 2012 to December 2018. The intraoperative hemorrhage classification (J0-3) was used to evaluate the bleeding characteristics during ESD operation. The differences in ESD completion between J0-2 and J3 groups were compared and Logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors of J3.

Results

A total of 231 patients were included and J0-2 cases accounted for 83.1%. Three patients in the J3 group did not complete the ESD operation and the J0-2 group had no uncompleted cases. Compared with the J0-2 group, J3 group had lower complete resection rate (52.8% vs 86.5%, P<0.01), but higher additional surgery rate (25% vs 10.9%, P=0.03). Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the gastric horn, body, and cardia-fundus lesions, infiltrated into the mucosal muscle layer and below, moderate-low differentiated carcinoma was a risk factor for J3. Multivariate Logistic regression showed that gastric horn, body and cardia-fundus lesions were independent predictors of J3.

Conclusion

The intraoperative hemorrhage grade of ESD treatment for early gastric cancer is usually J0-2 grade. When the intraoperative hemorrhage grade reaches J3, the complete resection rate of ESD will be reduced and the additional operation rate will be increased. The non-antrum gastric lesion is an independent predictor of J3 occurrence.

表1 早期胃癌ESD术中出血分级(n)
表2 早期胃癌不同术中出血分级对ESD完成程度的影响
表3 早期胃癌不同术中出血分级的临床资料特点
表4 不同术中出血分级危险因素的Logistic回归分析
项目 单因素分析OR值(95%CI) P 多因素分析OR值(95%CI) P
部位        
  胃窦 1.00   1.00  
  胃角 4.04(1.52~10.72) <0.01 4.25(1.45~12.45) <0.01
  胃体 2.78(1.04~7.41) 0.04 3.53(1.21~10.30) 0.02
  贲门-胃底 3.89(1.47~10.29) <0.01 3.65(1.21~11.30) 0.02
切除大小        
  长径 1.02(0.83~1.27) 0.83 0.93(0.72~1.21) 0.61
  长径/短径 3.09(0.97~9.83) 0.06 3.48(0.84~14.44) 0.09
  萎缩性胃炎(是/否) 1.33(0.63~2.84) 0.46 1.70(0.72~4.02) 0.23
  术前EUS(是/否) 0.89(0.45~1.79) 0.75 0.67(0.30~1.49) 0.33
病灶状态        
  无糜烂或溃疡 1.00   1.00  
  糜烂 0.82(034~2.00) 0.67 0.76(0.28~2.06) 0.60
  溃疡 0.78(0.35~1.71) 0.53 0.51(0.19~1.39) 0.19
大体形态        
  Ⅰ类 1.44(0.57~3.64) 0.44 1.51(0.50~4.61) 0.47
  Ⅱ类 1.00   1.00  
  Ⅲ类 2.47(0.87~7.02) 0.09 2.64(0.73~9.58) 0.14
浸润深度        
  黏膜肌层以上 1.00   1.00  
  黏膜肌层及以下 2.16(1.06~4.40) 0.04 1.86(0.75~4.60) 0.18
病理类型        
  高分化 1.00   1.00  
  中-低分化 2.13(1.03~4.39) 0.04 2.20(0.88~5.54) 0.09
伴随疾病        
  高血压(是/否) 1.04(0.51~2.11) 0.91 0.94(0.40~2.18) 0.88
  糖尿病(是/否) 0.98(0.32~3.05) 0.98 1.02(0.27~3.85) 0.97
  其它慢性病(是/否) 1.28(0.52~3.19) 0.59 1.47(0.46~4.66) 0.52
1月内抗凝或抗血小板药物史(是/否) 1.24(0.25~6.09) 0.79 0.86(0.13~5.92) 0.88
[1]
中华医学会消化内镜学分会,中国抗癌协会肿瘤内镜专业委员会. 中国早期胃癌筛查及内镜诊治共识意见(2014年,长沙)[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2014,31(7): 361-377.
[2]
Jang JS, Choi SR, Graham DY,et al. Risk factors for immediate and delayed bleeding associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplastic lesions[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2009,44(11): 1370-1376.
[3]
Jeon SW, Jung MK, Cho CM,et al. Predictors of immediate bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric lesions[J]. Surg Endosc,2009,23(9): 1974-1979.
[4]
Pyo JH, Lee H, Min BH,et al. Long-Term Outcome of Endoscopic Resection vs. Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: A Non-inferiority -Matched Cohort Study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol,2016,111(2): 240-249.
[5]
Zhao Y, Wang C. Long-Term Clinical Efficacy and Perioperative Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Early Gastric Cancer:An Updated Meta-Analysis[J]. Biomed Res Int,2018,2018: 3152346.
[6]
张荣,田叶红,张利云,等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗上消化道早癌及癌前病变并发术中出血危险因素分析[J]. 山西医科大学学报,2016,47(4): 352-355.
[7]
Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH,et al. Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms:Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2009,69(7): 1228-1235.
[8]
Eom BW, Kim YI, Kim KH,et al. Survival benefit of additional surgery after noncurative endoscopic resection in patients with early gastric cancer [J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2017,85(1): 155-163.e153.
[9]
Jeon MY, Park JC, Hahn KY,et al. Long-term outcomes after noncurative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer:the optimal time for additional endoscopic treatment [J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2018,87(4): 1003-1013.e1002.
[10]
Kim HW, Kim JH, Park JC,et al. Additive endoscopic resection may be sufficient for patients with a positive lateral margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2017,86(5): 849-856.
[11]
侯晓佳,李兆申,施新岗,等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效及出血危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2012,29(10): 549-553.
[12]
Park SE, Kim DH, Jung HY,et al. Risk factors and correlations of immediate,early delayed,and late delayed bleeding associated with endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms[J]. Surg Endosc,2016,30(2): 625-632.
[13]
张克,李丹丹,张斌. ESD治疗胃黏膜病变的出血相关因素分析[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2018,22(3): 497-500.
[14]
Libanio D, Costa MN, Pimentel-Nunes P,et al. Risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2016,84(4): 572-586.
[15]
Jeong JY, Oh YH, Yu YH, et al. Does submucosal fibrosis affect the results of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric tumors? [J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2012,76(1): 59-66.
[16]
令狐恩强. 消化内镜手术术中出血分级法[J/CD]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志,2018,5(2): 61-63.
[1] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 张秋阳, 余韶芸, 潘向滢, 金家佳, 夏桦, 赵雪红. 成年体外膜肺氧合患者出血影响因素的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 392-398.
[4] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[5] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[9] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[10] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[11] 王永楠, 汤畅通, 殷杰, 谭溢涛. 微创钻孔引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗临界量基底节脑出血的效果对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 286-292.
[12] 吴广迎, 张延娟, 秦鹏, 卢艳丽. 经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术预防上消化道出血的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 545-548.
[13] 梁艳娉, 陈燕柔, 梁运啸, 白飞虎, 吴斌, 王省. 华南地区门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血内镜治疗现状调研分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 390-395.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?