切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 207 -211. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2022.04.003

论著

胃低级别上皮内瘤变内镜下射频消融术后复发患者处置的临床研究
王楠钧1, 柴宁莉1, 令狐恩强1,(), 牛晓彤1, 刘圣圳1, 李隆松1, 张文刚1, 王沙沙1, 高飞2   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部;334000 江西,解放军73123部队
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-20 出版日期:2022-11-15
  • 通信作者: 令狐恩强
  • 基金资助:
    首都特色临床应用研究(Z181100001718177)

Clinical study on the management of patients with recurrent gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia after endoscopic radiofrequency ablation

Nanjun Wang1, Ningli Chai1, Enqiang Linghu1,(), Xiaotong Niu1, Shengzhen Liu1, Longsong Li1, Wengang Zhang1, Shasha Wang1, Fei Gao2   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China; Troop 73123, Jiangxi 334000, China
  • Received:2022-10-20 Published:2022-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Enqiang Linghu
引用本文:

王楠钧, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 李隆松, 张文刚, 王沙沙, 高飞. 胃低级别上皮内瘤变内镜下射频消融术后复发患者处置的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 207-211.

Nanjun Wang, Ningli Chai, Enqiang Linghu, Xiaotong Niu, Shengzhen Liu, Longsong Li, Wengang Zhang, Shasha Wang, Fei Gao. Clinical study on the management of patients with recurrent gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia after endoscopic radiofrequency ablation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(04): 207-211.

目的

本文通过回顾性对比分析,探索胃低级别上皮内瘤变射频消融术后复发患者的临床处置策略。

方法

回顾性选择2014年10月至2022年9月于我中心完成胃低级别上皮内瘤变射频消融治疗术后复发的53例患者,依据其是否接受追加治疗分为随访组与治疗组,对比两组的相关指标。

结果

随访组与治疗组在性别、年龄、病程、病变部位、随访时长方面没有明显差异(P> 0.05),但治疗组病变消除率明显优于随访组(91.3% vs 43.3%,P< 0.001),而治疗组三种术式间的疗效差异尚不显著(P=0.640)。

结论

对于胃低级别上皮内瘤变射频消融术后复发的患者,建议追加内镜下毁损或切除治疗。

Objective

To explore the clinical management strategy of patients with recurrent gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia after radiofrequency ablation.

Methods

53 patients with recurrent gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia who completed radiofrequency ablation in our center from October 2014 to September 2022 were retrospectively selected and divided into follow-up group and treatment group according to whether they received additional treatment. The relevant indicators of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender, age, course of disease, site of lesion and duration of follow-up between the two groups (P> 0.05), but the elimination rate of lesion in the treatment group was significantly better than that in the follow-up group (91.3% vs 43.3%, P< 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the three surgical methods in the treatment group (P= 0.640).

Conclusion

Additional endoscopic ablation or resection is recommended for patients with recurrent gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia after radiofrequency ablation.

图1 内镜下发现病变
图2 放大内镜联合窄带成像精细评估病变
图3 内镜下射频消融术
图4 术后随访(原治疗区域活检)
表1 随访组与治疗组基线资料及随访对比情况[例(%)]
表2 治疗组三种术式对比情况[例(%)]
[1]
Liu YCai YChen S,et al.Analysis of Risk Factors of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Subjects Undergoing Physical Examination[J].Gastroenterol Res Pract20202020:7907195.
[2]
den Hollander WJHolster ILden Hoed CM,et al.Surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions:a multicentre prospective cohort study from low incidence regions[J]. Gut201968(4):585-593.
[3]
北京医学会消化内镜学分会.胃低级别上皮内瘤变规范化诊治专家共识(2019,北京)[J/CD].中华胃肠内镜电子杂志20196(2):49-56.
[4]
Wu SZhu XXiang L,et al.The Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Forceps Biopsy Compared to ESD[J].Open Med (Wars)201712:261-265.
[5]
Jeon JWKim SJJang JY,et al.Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection for Low-Grade Dysplasia and High-Grade Dysplasia on Gastric Pretreatment Biopsy: Korea ESD Study Group[J].Gut Liver, 202115(2):225-231.
[6]
令狐恩强,冯佳,马晓冰,等.内镜下射频消融术治疗食管和胃低级别上皮内瘤变的临床研究[J/CD].中华胃肠内镜电子杂志20152(1):14-17.
[7]
Wang NJChai NLTang XW,et al.Clinical efficacy and prognostic risk factors of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol202214(3):724-733.
[8]
冯佳.内镜射频消融治疗胃低级别上皮内瘤变的实验及临床研究[D].中国人民解放军总医院;解放军医学院,2017.
[9]
冯佳,令狐恩强.胃低级别上皮内瘤变的内镜诊疗技术进展[J/CD].中华胃肠内镜电子杂志20174(1):29-32.
[10]
Park SYJeon SWJung MK,et al.Long-term follow-up study of gastric intraepithelial neoplasias: progression from low-grade dysplasia to invasive carcinoma[J].Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol200820(10):966-970.
[11]
王宇菲,张波,令狐恩强,等.从胃低级别上皮内瘤变切除标本看此类患者的处置原则[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)20136(6):410-414.
[12]
Zhang YWu XZhang C,et al.Dissecting expression profiles of gastric precancerous lesions and early gastric cancer to explore crucial molecules in intestinal-type gastric cancer tumorigenesis[J]. J Pathol2020251(2):135-146.
[13]
Li FZhu HTao K,et al.Mucosal microbial microenvironment in early gastric neoplasia and non-neoplastic gastric disease[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol2021, 36(11): 3092-3101.
[14]
李宝,柴宁莉,汤小伟,等.胃低级别瘤变内镜下氩离子凝固术后局部复发的影响因素[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)202114(2):104-108.
[15]
Wang NChai NLi L,et al.Comparison of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation and Argon Plasma Coagulation in Patients with Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia:A Large-Scale Retrospective Study[J].Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 20222022:2349940.
[16]
Kim BKim BJSeo IK,et al.Cost-effectiveness and short-term clinical outcomes of argon plasma coagulation compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of gastric low-grade dysplasia[J].Medicine (Baltimore)201897(15):e0330.
[17]
Jung SJCho SJChoi IJ,et al.Argon plasma coagulation is safe and effective for treating smaller gastric lesions with low-grade dysplasia:a comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection[J].Surg Endosc201327(4):1211-1218.
[18]
Quiroz-Guadarrama CDHerrera-Esquivel JJRojano-Rodríguez M, et al. Endoscopic gastric submucosal dissection in low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex, 201479(2):149-151.
[19]
Huh CWKim JKim BW,et al.Pathologic Validation of Endoscopic Ablative Therapy for Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J].Turk J Gastroenterol202132(12):1029-1037.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[4] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[5] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[6] 高建新, 王啸飞, 于淼, 路夷平. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后行ISR术远切缘距离的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 539-543.
[7] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[8] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[9] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[10] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[11] 闫亚飞, 范学圣, 张舰, 吴勇. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发腹股沟疝的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[12] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[13] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[14] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?