切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 81 -87. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2024.02.003

论著

超级微创手术模式与器官切除模式下结直肠癌患者的生活质量和心理状态变化
蔡朝蓓1, 陈倩倩2,(), 宁波2, 李惠凯2, 袁新普3, 令狐恩强2,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部;100853 北京,解放军医学院
    2. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部
    3. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科医学部
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-18 出版日期:2024-05-15
  • 通信作者: 陈倩倩, 令狐恩强
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFC2503600、2022YFC2503601、2022YFC2503604)

Changes in quality of life and psychological status of patients with colorectal cancer under the super minimally invasive surgery mode and the organ resection mode

Zhaobei Cai1, Qianqian Chen1,(), Bo Ning1, Huikai Li1, Xinpu Yuan2, Enqiang Linghu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    2. Chinese PLA Medical Shool, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2024-03-18 Published:2024-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Qianqian Chen, Enqiang Linghu
引用本文:

蔡朝蓓, 陈倩倩, 宁波, 李惠凯, 袁新普, 令狐恩强. 超级微创手术模式与器官切除模式下结直肠癌患者的生活质量和心理状态变化[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(02): 81-87.

Zhaobei Cai, Qianqian Chen, Bo Ning, Huikai Li, Xinpu Yuan, Enqiang Linghu. Changes in quality of life and psychological status of patients with colorectal cancer under the super minimally invasive surgery mode and the organ resection mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2024, 11(02): 81-87.

目的

评估超级微创手术(SMIS)模式与器官切除模式下结直肠癌患者的生活质量和心理状态变化。

方法

前瞻性纳入2023年3~8月在解放军总医院第一医学中心住院治疗的结直肠癌患者,根据术中是否切除肠管,将患者分为SMIS组(单纯切除病变而保全肠管)和器官切除组(切除病变及部分肠管)。分别于手术前和术后1、3、6个月收集患者的生活质量和心理状态资料,生活质量的评估选用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷C30和CR29;心理状态评估使用疾病进展恐惧简化量表(FoP-Q-SF)、Zung氏焦虑(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)。

结果

共纳入47例患者,SMIS组24例,器官切除组23例。SMIS组术后1、3、6个月便中带血或黏液、便频和FoP-Q-SF的评分均低于术前水平。器官切除组术后1个月时的体能、胜任能力、社交能力和便中带血或黏液评分低于术前水平;而疲劳、疼痛、呼吸困难、臀部疼痛、味觉异常、胀气、便失禁、皮肤疼痛和排便窘迫评分高于术前水平。器官切除组术后3、6个月时便中带血或黏液评分均低于术前水平;排便窘迫评分均高于术前水平;而FoP-Q-SF、SAS和SDS评分与术前差异无统计学意义。

结论

SMIS模式下,结直肠癌患者术后1、3、6个月的生活质量和心理状态中的疾病进展恐惧均较术前改善;器官切除模式下,术后1个月生活质量下降,随后3至6个月内逐渐上升,而心理状态变化不明显。

Objective

To evaluate the changes in quality of life and psychological status in patients with colorectal cancer under the super minimally invasive surgery(SMIS) mode or the organ resection mode.

Methods

Prospectively, patients with colorectal cancer who were hospitalized in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from March to August 2023 were included.The patients were divided into two groups according to whether intestinal resection was performed during the operation: SMIS group(simple excision of the lesion to preserve the intestinal tract) and organ resection group(excision of part of the intestine along with the lesion).Prior to surgery and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months, data on the patient′s quality of life and psychological state were collected.The quality of life was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 and-CR29, and the psychological status was evaluated using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and Self-rating depression scale (SDS).

Results

A total of 47 patients were included in the study, with 24 in the SMIS group and 23 in the organ resection group.In the SMIS group, the scores for blood or mucus in stool, stool frequency and FoP-Q-SF at the postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th month were significantly lower than those before operation.Physical fitness, role function, social function, and blood or mucus in stools scores were lower than the preoperative levels in the organ resection group at 1 month postoperatively; while fatigue, pain, dyspnea, buttock pain, taste abnormalities, flatulence, fecal incontinence, skin pain and defecation embarrassment scores were higher than preoperative levels.In the organ resection group, the postoperative 3rd and 6th month scores for blood or mucus in stool were lower than the preoperative level; the score for defecation embarrassment was higher than the preoperative level; however, there were no significant differences in FoP-Q-SF, SAS and SDS compared with the preoperative period.

Conclusion

Under the SMIS mode, the quality of life and fear of disease progression in psychological status for colorectal cancer patients improved at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively compared to the preoperative period. Under the organ resection mode, the quality of life significantly declined at 1 month postoperatively, then gradually improved within 3 to 6 months, with no significant changes in psychological status.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组患者疾病和治疗相关资料[例(%)]
图1 2组患者EORTC QLQ-C30子量表线性评分的均值折线图注:SMIS为超级微创手术;EORTC QLQ-C30指欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-核心30;*表示组内对应时间点的评分与术前评分相比P<0.05,**P<0.001;†表示对应时间点SMIS组与器官切除组的评分对比P<0.05,††为P<0.001
图2 2组患者EORTC QLQ-CR29子量表线性评分的均值折线图注:SMIS为超级微创手术;EORTC QLQ-CR29指欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-结直肠29;*表示组内对应时间点的评分与术前评分相比P<0.05,**P<0.001;†表示对应时间点SMIS组与器官切除组的评分对比P<0.05
图3 2组患者心理状态各量表的评分注:SMIS为超级微创手术;FoP-Q-SF指疾病进展恐惧简化量表;SAS指Zung氏焦虑自评量表;SDS指Zung氏抑郁自评量表;*表示组内对应时间点的评分与术前评分相比P<0.05;†表示对应时间点SMIS组与器官切除组的评分对比P<0.05
[1]
Sung HFerlay JSiegel RL,et al.Global Cancer Statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin202171(3):209-249.
[2]
Linghu EQ.New direction for surgery:super minimally invasive surgery[J].World J Gastroenterol202430(12):1676-1679.
[3]
Jang SRTruong HOh A,et al.Cost-effectiveness evaluation of targeted surgical and endoscopic therapies for early colorectal adenocarcinoma based on biomarker profiles[J].JAMA Netw Open20203(3):e1919963.
[4]
Bae HJJu HLee HH,et al.Long-term outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma[J].Surg Endosc202337(2):1231-1241.
[5]
秦蕾,李广鹏,张兰芳,等.内镜下黏膜剥离术治疗早期结直肠癌的疗效及对患者远期预后的影响[J].癌症进展202220(9):966-968,971.
[6]
Custers PAvan der Sande MEGrotenhuis BA,et al.Long-term quality of life and functional outcome of patients with rectal cancer following a watch-and-wait approach[J].JAMA Surg2023158(5): e230146.
[7]
Lin JBZhang LWu DW,et al. Validation of the chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 in patients with colorectal cancer[J].World J Gastroenterol201723(10):1891-1898.
[8]
Lu Q, Liu QFang S,et al.Relationship between fear of progression and symptom burden,disease factors and social/family factors in patients with stage-Ⅳ breast cancer in Shandong, China[J].Cancer Med202413(4):e6749.
[9]
Dunstan DAScott N.Norms for Zung's self-rating anxiety scale[J]. BMC Psychiatry202020(1):90.
[10]
Shao RHe PLing B,et al.Prevalence of depression and anxiety and correlations between depression, anxiety, family functioning, social support and coping styles among Chinese medical students[J]. BMC Psychol20208(1):38.
[11]
Dang Hde Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WHvan der Zwaan S,et al.Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer patients treated with endoscopic or surgical tumor resection[J].Gastrointest Endosc201989(3):533-544.
[12]
Tsunoda ANakao KHiratsuka K,et al.Prospective analysis of quality of life in the first year after colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Acta Oncol200746(1):77-82.
[13]
Zhao HKanda K.Translation and validation of the standard Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30[J].Qual Life Res2000, 9(2):129-137.
[14]
Yde JLarsen HMLaurberg S,et al.Chronic diarrhoea following surgery for colon cancer-frequency,causes and treatment options[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis201833(6):683-694.
[15]
Buchli CMartling ASjövall A.Low anterior resection syndrome after right- and left-sided resections for colonic cancer[J].BJS Open, 20193(3):387-394.
[16]
Rao STan GAbdulla H,et al.Does colectomy predispose to small intestinal bacterial (SIBO) and fungal overgrowth (SIFO)?[J].Clin Transl Gastroenterol20189(4):146.
[17]
Banaszak MGórna IWozniak D,et al.Association between gut dysbiosis and the occurrence of SIBO, LIBO, SIFO and IMO[J]. Microorganisms202311(3):573.
[18]
van Heinsbergen Mden Haan NMaaskant-Braat AJ,et al. Functional bowel complaints and quality of life after surgery for colon cancer:prevalence and predictive factors[J].Colorectal Dis, 202022(2):136-145.
[19]
Rooney MKPasli MChang GJ,et al.Patient-reported sexual function,bladder function and quality of life for patients with low rectal cancers with or without a permanent ostomy[J].Cancers (Basel)202316(1):153.
[20]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2023版)[J].中华消化外科杂志202322(6):667-698.
[1] 陈金业, 凌潜龙, 朱冰, 骆杰. 补体B因子在结直肠癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 192-198.
[2] 孙姚承, 汤建军, 张伟元, 刘传磊. 阳性淋巴结比和阳性淋巴结对数比对结直肠癌患者预后价值的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 204-208.
[3] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[4] 施烨鑫, 马翔, 鲁明, 夏青城, 王鹏超, 宋青雨, 赵庆洪. 腹腔镜下结直肠肿瘤定位研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 463-466.
[5] 李萍, 陈慧, 庄君龙. 快速康复外科在机器人辅助腹腔镜膀胱切除回肠造口术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 249-253.
[6] 孙红燕, 李娟. 造口旁疝患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 273-276.
[7] 牛斌, 饶兰英, 刘晓晨, 何龙林, 秦培鑫. 基于孟德尔随机化分析胆囊切除与结直肠肛管恶性肿瘤发生的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 313-318.
[8] 程璞, 郑朝旭. 伴有错配修复缺陷的病理Ⅱ期结直肠癌临床病理特征分析及生存分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 236-241.
[9] 杨明, 张金珠, 王锡山. 全国肿瘤登记中心发布的2013年至2022年结直肠癌流行数据趋势解读[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 177-181.
[10] 黄胜辉, 阮浩杨. 降结肠系膜旋转不良合并结直肠癌的腹腔镜手术策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 182-188.
[11] 张继新, 谢爽, 王雪莲, 武祖印, 梁延洋, 张春旭. 经鼻插入肠梗阻导管联合NOSES微创治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 189-196.
[12] 张金珠, 梅世文, 孙金峰, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 李国利, 汪欣, 王锡山, 汤坚强. 原发结直肠癌超系膜切除术后患者的生存危险因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 197-204.
[13] 陈海鹏, 张金珠, 关旭, 赵志勋, 刘恒昌, 姜争, 刘正, 王锡山. 达芬奇机器人辅助直肠及乙状结肠癌根治术的学习曲线分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 205-208.
[14] 王龙, 武帅, 王炳智, 郑波, 李文斌, 邹霜梅. 结直肠印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 229-235.
[15] 张毅勋, 关旭, 焦帅, 张鑫, 刘茂希, 高晟, 冯毅, 王文渊, 江波, 白文启, 刘海义, 王锡山. 腔镜切割荷包吻合器在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的应用体会[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 148-152.
阅读次数
全文


摘要