Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02): 105-111. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2024.02.007

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

A Meta-analysis of the cost and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic versus open radical resection for colorectal cancer

Ning Zhou1, Xiaoyue Yin1, Zhuoyu Sun1, Xueli Yang1, Yinghui Bao2, Min Zhao3, Boyan Li2, Miao Liu4, Juan Xie1,()   

  1. 1. School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Environment, Nutrition and Public Health, Tianjin 300070, China
    2. Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China; Institute of Geriatrics, Beijing Key Laboratory of Aging and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics Diseases, Second Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    3. Department of Gastroenterology, Second Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
    4. Department of anti-NBC Medicine, Graduate school, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2023-10-12 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-07-12
  • Contact: Juan Xie

Abstract:

Objective

Meta-analysis was used to compare the cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal resection(LCR) and open colorectal resection(OCR) in patients with colorectal cancer(CRC).

Methods

CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed, Embase and PubMed databases were searched to obtain relevant studies on laparoscopic radical colorectal resection and open radical resection of colorectal cancer from the establishment of the database to June 30, 2023.Stata 14.0 software was used to statistically analyze the cost and clinical efficacy outcome effect size.

Result

Thirty-three papers were included in the study with a total sample size of 4799 cases, including 2548 LCR and 2251 OCR. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in total cost between the laparoscopic group and the open group MD(95% CI)=472.8(-435.02, 1380.62), P>0.05, that the length of hospital stay and the length of postoperative deflation were shorter in the laparoscopic group MD(95%CI)=-4.11(-5.11, -3.11), P<0.001, MD(95%CI)=-26.67(-37.08, -16.26), P<0.001; the complication rate was lower OR(95%CI)=0.54(0.45, 0.64), P<0.001; but the operation time was longer MD(95%CI)=26.75(18.06, 35.43), P<0.001.

Conclusion

LCR has significant health economic advantages in the short-term postoperative period, significantly reduces the length of hospital stay and postoperative venting time, reduces the rate of postoperative complications, and contributes to postoperative recovery. Considering the cost and efficacy indicators, LCR is recommended as the preferred method of treatment for colorectal cancer patients compared with open surgery.

Key words: Colorectal cancer, Radical surgery, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Meta-analysis

京ICP备07035254号-14
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-68295401 E-mail: zhwcnj@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd