切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 130 -133. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2022.03.003

论著

围手术期消化道肿瘤患者营养风险与营养支持情况研究
郝婧1,(), 阳柳柳1, 韩优1, 张晓1   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-01 出版日期:2022-08-15
  • 通信作者: 郝婧

Nutritional risk and nutritional support in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms during perioperative period

Jing Hao1,(), Liuliu Yang1, You Han1, Xiao Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 100853 Beijing, China
  • Received:2022-07-01 Published:2022-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Jing Hao
引用本文:

郝婧, 阳柳柳, 韩优, 张晓. 围手术期消化道肿瘤患者营养风险与营养支持情况研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 130-133.

Jing Hao, Liuliu Yang, You Han, Xiao Zhang. Nutritional risk and nutritional support in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms during perioperative period[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(03): 130-133.

目的

对围手术期消化道肿瘤患者营养风险情况、营养支持情况进行调查探究,了解围手术期消化道肿瘤患者营养管理现状,为营养干预质量提升提供指导。

方法

选取2021年4月至2022年4月解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科医学部收治手术治疗的消化道肿瘤患者为研究对象,通过营养风险筛查表(NRS2002)与临床资料收集分析,了解其营养风险与营养支持情况。

结果

本次纳入研究的患者684例,年龄平均(58.65±12.25)岁,体重指数正常者占60.09%,体重异常者占39.91%。从体重指数来看,营养不良风险位于前3位的临床诊断为食管癌(13.46%)、胃癌(17.09%)、肠癌(18.06%)。NRS2002平均分为(4.26±1.84)分,35.67%的患者NRS2002评分≥3分,以肠癌、胃癌、食管癌为主。266例(38.89%)患者在围手术期接受营养支持,其中肠外营养占79.70%。NRS2002评分≥3患者中71.72%接受营养支持,NRS2002评分<3患者中20.68%接受营养支持。食管癌(32.05%)、胃癌(56.96%)、肠癌(56.25%)、肝癌(29.59%)患者接受营养支持的比例较高。营养支持后患者营养指标水平高于营养支持前(P<0.05)。

结论

围手术期消化道肿瘤患者营养不良风险较高,营养支持对改善患者健康状况存在积极影响。目前虽然有部分消化道癌患者在围手术期接受了营养支持,但从整体来看营养支持仍有待改进。

Objective

To explore the current status of nutritional risk, nutritional support, and nutritional management in patients with gastrointestinal tumors in the perioperative period, to provide guidance for improving the quality of nutritional intervention.

Methods

Patients with gastrointestinal tumors admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology, the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from April 2021 to April 2022 were selected as the research objects. The nutritional risk screening form (NRS2002) was used and clinical information were collected to analyzed their nutritional risk and nutritional support.

Results

A total of 684 subjects were included in this study, with an average age of (58.65±12.25) years old, 60.09% of them had normal body mass index, and 39.91% had abnormal body weight. In terms of body mass index, the top three clinical diagnoses of malnutrition risk were esophageal cancer (13.46%), gastric cancer (17.09%), and bowel cancer (18.06%). The average score of NRS2002 was (4.26±1.84), and 35.67% of the patients had NRS2002 score ≥3, mainly colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and esophageal cancer. A total of 266 patients (38.89%) received perioperative nutritional support, and 79.70% of them received parenteral nutrition. 71.72% of patients with NRS2002 score ≥3 received nutritional support, and 20.68% of patients with NRS2002 score < 3 received nutritional support. Patients with esophageal cancer (32.05%), gastric cancer (56.96%), bowel cancer (56.25%) and liver cancer (29.59%) were more likely to receive nutritional support. The level of nutritional indexes after nutritional support was higher than that before nutritional support (P< 0.05).

Conclusions

The malnourished risk of patients with gastrointestinal cancer in perioperative period is high. Nutritional support has a positive effect on improving the health status of patients. At present, although some patients with gastrointestinal cancer receive nutritional support during perioperative period, the overall nutritional support still needs to be improved.

表1 两组一般资料(±s)
表2 研究对象体重指数分布情况[例(%)]
表3 研究对象营养风险评估情况(±s)
表4 研究对象营养支持分布情况[例(%)]
表5 营养支持前后相关指标比较[g/L, (±s)]
[1]
赫捷,陈万青. 2012中国肿瘤登记年报[M]. 军事医学科学出版社,2012.
[2]
周俊,钟君,付双林,等.消化道恶性肿瘤患者临床营养状况及相关因素分析[J].中国食物与营养201925(11):76-79.
[3]
Schwegler I, Holzen AV, Gutzwiller JP, et al. Nutritional risk is a clinical predictor of postoperative mortality and morbidity in surgery for colorectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(1):92-97.
[4]
Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O,et al.Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials[J]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(3):321-336.
[5]
中国抗癌协会肿瘤营养专业委员会.恶性肿瘤营养不良的特征[J/CD].肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志7(3): 276-282.
[6]
陈昭屹.胃肠道肿瘤患者营养风险,营养不良与临床结局相关性[J]. 特别健康20218(23):243-243.
[7]
施尧,关美云,张玉珍,等.肿瘤住院患者营养风险及营养支持现况分析[J].解放军医学院学报201940(7):679-681.
[8]
翁敏,代正燕,甘志明,等.常见恶性肿瘤住院患者营养状况及影响因素分析[J/CD]. 肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志20229(2):195-199.
[9]
俞秀兰,杨琼.术后极早期肠内营养护理对老年结肠癌患者胃肠功能恢复的影响[J].重庆医学2021, 50(S2):434-436.
[1] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[2] 付佳, 肖海敏, 武曦, 冯涛, 师帅. 年龄校正查尔森合并症指数对腹腔镜结直肠癌围手术期并发症的预测价值[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 336-341.
[3] 黄翠君, 张喜玲, 刘思嘉, 刘云建. 重症急性胰腺炎营养支持治疗研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 385-390.
[4] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[7] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[8] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[9] 刘琪, 王殿琛, 符洋. 复杂腹壁疝诊疗问题与要点[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 504-508.
[10] 朱迪, 欧阳钒, 杨丹, 华敏, 吴倩. 双轨护理在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 630-634.
[11] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[12] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[13] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[14] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[15] 苏鹏, 吕会来, 温士旺, 黄超, 张缜, 田子强. 全腔镜下食管癌根治术围手术期呼吸系统并发症发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 294-298.
阅读次数
全文


摘要