切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 103 -108. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2023.02.005

论著

改良二联方案与标准四联方案治疗幽门螺杆菌感染临床对照研究
简文华, 何朝晖()   
  1. 519100 珠海,遵义医科大学第五附属(珠海)医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-20 出版日期:2023-05-15
  • 通信作者: 何朝晖
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省卫生健康委员会(gzwjkj 00-1-077)

Clinical comparison between improved double regimen and standard quadruple regimen for Helicobacter pylori

Wenhua Jian, Zhaohui He()   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital (Zhuhai) of Zunyi Medical University, Zhuhai 519100, China
  • Received:2023-02-20 Published:2023-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhaohui He
引用本文:

简文华, 何朝晖. 改良二联方案与标准四联方案治疗幽门螺杆菌感染临床对照研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 103-108.

Wenhua Jian, Zhaohui He. Clinical comparison between improved double regimen and standard quadruple regimen for Helicobacter pylori[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2023, 10(02): 103-108.

目的

探讨伏诺拉生联合阿莫西林7d疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(Hp)的临床应用价值。

方法

收集2022年3月至2022年11月遵义医科大学第五附属(珠海)医院消化内科收治的100例Hp感染的患者临床资料,分为研究组(伏诺拉生+阿莫西林)和对照组(标准四联疗法),每组各50例。统计分析两组患者的Hp根治情况、临床症状缓解情况、不良反应发生情况及成本-效果分析。

结果

研究组根治率为94%,对照组为88%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患者临床症状缓解率为84%,显著高于对照组的62%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组不良反应发生率为12%,显著低于对照组的54%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组总费用为143.02元,对照组总费用384.41元,研究组成本低于对照组。

结论

伏诺拉生联合阿莫西林7 d疗法可达到标准四联的根除率,临床症状缓解率高,不良反应率低,成本低,值得推广。

Objective

To study clinical application value of Vonoprazan combined with amoxicillin for 7 day regimen of Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Methods

The clinical data of 100 cases of Hp infection admitted to the Gastroenterology Department of the Fifth Affiliated (Zhuhai) Hospital of Zunyi Medical University were divided into study group (Vonoprazan+ amoxicillin) and control group (Standard quadruple therapy). There were 50 patients in each group. Statistical analysis of Helicobacter pylori eradication, remission of clinical symptoms, occurrence of adverse reactions and cost-effectiveness of the two groups.

Results

The radical cure rate was 94% in the study group and 88% in the control group, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); The remission rate of clinical symptoms in the study group was 84%, Significantly higher than the 62% of the control group, The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 12%, Significantly lower than the 54% of the control, The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); The total cost of the study group was 143.02 yuan, and the total cost of the control group was 384.41 yuan, The cost of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group.

Conclusion

The 7-day regimen containing Vonoprazan and amoxicillin can achieve the eradication rate of standard quadruple, the high remission rate of clinical symptoms, low adverse reactions, low cost, which is more worthy of promotion.

表1 两组患者Hp根除率的比较[例(%)]
表2 两组患者症状缓解率比较[例(%)]
表3 两组患者不良反应发生情况[例(%)]
表4 研究组和对照组成本-效果分析[例(%)]
[1]
池肇春.站在新的高度,做好幽门螺旋杆菌感染的防治[J].世界华人消化杂志201624(16):2454-2462.
[2]
Teng MKhoo ALZhao YJ, et al.Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of esomeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Helicobacter pylori infection[J].J Clin Pharm Ther201540(4):368-375.
[3]
Pan WZhang HWang L,et al.Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and kidney damage in patients with peptic ulcer[J].Ren Fail201941(1):1028-1034.
[4]
Gravina AGZagari RMDe Musis C,et al.Helicobacter pylori and extragastric diseases:A review[J].World J Gastroenterol2018, 24(29):3204-3221.
[5]
He JLiu YOuyang Q,et al.Helicobacter pylori and unignorable extragastric diseases:Mechanism and implications[J].Front Microbiol202213:972777.
[6]
Pellicano RIaniro GFagoonee S,et al.Review:Extragastric diseases and Helicobacter pylori[J].Helicobacter202025(Suppl 1):e12741.
[7]
Lin SYLin CLLiu JH,et al.Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and the subsequent risk of end-stage renal disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study[J].Int J Clin Pract, 201569(5):604-610.
[8]
Thung IAramin HVavinskaya V,et al.Review article: the global emergence of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther201643(4):514-533.
[9]
FitzGerald RSmith SM.An Overview of Helicobacter pylori Infection[J].Methods Mol Biol20212283:1-14.
[10]
Suzuki S, Esaki M, Kusano C,et al.Development of Helicobacter pylori treatment: How do we manage antimicrobial resistance?[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 201925(16):1907-1912.
[11]
陈珑,焦红梅.基于富马酸伏诺拉生的幽门螺杆菌根除治疗方案的现状[J].中国临床药理学杂志202238(20):2506-2509.
[12]
崔璨璨,李长锋,张斌.幽门螺旋杆菌感染治疗方案的研究现状和进展[J].吉林大学学报(医学版)201743(6):1287-1290.
[13]
张永芬,昝学凯.消化系统常见疾病与幽门螺杆菌感染的关系探讨[J].基层医学论坛202024(31):4468-4469.
[14]
Chey WDLeontiadis GIHowden CW, et al.Correction: ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection[J]. Am J Gastroenterol2018113(7):1102.
[15]
谢俏,魏晟,董丽凤,等.胃黏膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤1例[J].世界华人消化杂志201624(6):983-986.
[16]
Malfertheiner PMegraud FO′Morain CA, et al.Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report[J].Gut201766(1):6-30.
[17]
祝春梅,孙萌潞,徐锦江,等.健康体检人群幽门螺旋杆菌检出结果分析[J].锦州医科大学学报202041(1):39-40,46.
[18]
国家消化系疾病临床医学研究中心上海,国家消化道早癌防治中心联盟(GECA),中华医学会消化病学分会幽门螺杆菌学组,等.中国幽门螺杆菌根除与胃癌防控的专家共识意见(2019年,上海)[J].中华消化杂志201939(5):310-316.
[19]
Zizzi CFPellicano RBiancone L.The relationship between Helicobacter pylori and chronic kidney disease:update 2020[J]. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol202066(4):343-349.
[20]
朱明飞,赵丽娟,王立军.幽门螺杆菌分型检测及其与幽门螺杆菌根除率的关系研究[J].西北国防医学杂志201839(9):606- 610.
[21]
蔡雪梅,胡大春.CYP2C19遗传多态性与药物代谢及疗效的研究进展[J].当代医学201218(16):21-23.
[22]
McNicholl AGLinares PMNyssen OP,et al.MetA-analysis: esomeprazole or rabeprazole vs. first-generation pump inhibitors in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther201236(5):414-425.
[23]
Hong YDai DPCai JP,et al.Effects of Simvastatin on the Metabolism of Vonoprazan in Rats Both in vitro and in vivo[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 202216(9):1779-1789.
[24]
Zhou SZhao FLWang SH,et al.Assessments of CYP-inhibition-based drug-drug interaction between vonoprazan and poziotinib in vitro and in vivo[J].Pharm Biol, 202361(1):356-361.
[25]
中华医学会消化病学分会.2020年中国胃食管反流病专家共识[J].中华消化杂志202040(10):649-663.
[26]
李勉力,张伟健,郭玲珑,等.沃诺拉赞对比质子泵抑制剂治疗反流性食管炎有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J].中国全科医学202124(6):712-717.
[27]
张苑,朱晏,刘治恺,等.新型抑酸药物伏诺拉生在幽门螺杆菌治疗中的应用进展[J].实用医学杂志202137(24):3218-3222.
[28]
杨桂彬.伏诺拉生和低剂量阿莫西林组成的二联7 d方案是潜在新的一线幽门螺杆菌治疗方案[J].中华医学杂志2020100 (30):2382.
[29]
陈剑.伏诺拉生与阿莫西林二联治疗幽门螺杆菌感染胃溃疡的疗效和安全性[J].中国实用医药202116(1):125-127.
[30]
许文涛,许向波,任天舒,等.伏诺拉生在幽门螺杆菌根除治疗中的作用研究进展[J].解放军医学杂志202247(9):947-953.
[31]
Graham DYLu HShiotani A.Vonoprazan-containing Helicobacter pylori triple therapies contribution to global antimicrobial resistance[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol202136(5):1159-1163.
[32]
Maruyama MTanaka NKubota D,et al.Vonoprazan-Based Regimen Is More Useful than PPI-Based One as a First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication:A Randomized Controlled Trial[J].Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol20172017:4385161.
[33]
刘文忠,谢勇,成虹,等.第四次全国幽门螺杆菌感染处理共识报告[J].胃肠病学201217(10):618-625.
[34]
朱琦,刘文忠.幽门螺杆菌感染处理的当代概念Maastricht Ⅲ共识报告[J].中华消化杂志200727(4):257-261.
[35]
游航.含铋剂四联方案根除幽门螺杆菌治疗失败的危险因素分析[D] .山东大学,2020.
[36]
Ikuse TBlanchard TGCzinn SJ.Inflammation, Immunity,and Vaccine Development for the Gastric Pathogen Helicobacter pylori[J].Curr Top Microbiol Immunol201921(4):1-19.
[37]
Savoldi ACarrara EGraham DY, et al.Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A Systematic Review and MetA-analysis in World Health Organization Regions[J]. Gastroenterology2018155(5):1372-1382.
[38]
中华医学会消化病学分会幽门螺杆菌学组.2022中国幽门螺杆菌感染治疗指南[J].中华消化杂志202242(11):745-756.
[39]
Kadkhodaei SSiavoshi FAkbari Noghabi K.Mucoid and coccoid Helicobacter pylori with fast growth and antibiotic resistance[J]. Helicobacter202025(2):126-128.
[40]
郑攀.高耐药形势下如何提高幽门螺杆菌的根除率[J].中国实用内科杂志202242(2):324-329.
[41]
韩莹莹,方丹,官佳轮,等.阿莫西林和质子泵抑制剂二联治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的研究进展[J]中华消化杂志202242(2):137-140.
[42]
Sugimoto MFuruta T.Efficacy of tailored Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotype[J].World J Gastroenterol, 201420(21): 6400- 6411.
[43]
陈团生,陈孝敏.伏诺拉生对幽门螺杆菌阳性消化性溃疡患者的疗效、安全性、复发率及生活质量的影响[J].中外医学研究202119(23):163-165.
[44]
Graham DYLu HYamaoka Y.A report card to grade Helicobacter pylori therapy[J].Helicobacter200712(4):275-278.
[45]
王丽娜,张田,曹娅,等.伏诺拉生根除幽门螺杆菌感染的快速卫生技术评估[J].临床药物治疗杂志202220(10):17-22.
[1] 李梦声, 韩中博. 胃癌的高危可控因素——幽门螺杆菌感染[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 145-150.
[2] 田家庚, 李熳, 王赜煜, 赵莹, 张志广. 胃饥饿素介导幽门螺杆菌相关消化不良的动物实验研究[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 313-319.
[3] 杨雁慧, 许彤丽, 史淑利. 两种含铋四联方案治疗幽门螺杆菌感染根除后复发疗效及其影响因素[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 178-184.
[4] 郭长江, 冷建刚, 邵伟. 阿莫西林克拉维酸钾联合布地奈德治疗小儿反复细菌性呼吸道感染[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 394-396.
[5] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[6] 石小琼, 殷国建. 不同观察时间对幽门螺杆菌快速尿素酶试验诊断准确性的研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 150-154.
[7] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[8] 董青, 丁飞, 郭浩, 李峰. Nesfatin-1/NUCB2在幽门螺杆菌感染相关早期胃癌患者中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 783-789.
[9] 魏红涛, 普布仓决, 格桑央宗, 黎燕, 益西旺扎, 李鹏. 拉萨地区上消化道溃疡患者幽门螺杆菌感染及治疗分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 662-665.
[10] 李微, 陈晓莉, 蔡仁颂, 朱莉, 闾素婷, 邢小丽. 白光胃镜下胃黏膜形态变化对幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 152-156.
[11] 郝国庆, 张秀梅, 房庆城, 姜朝新. 不同型別幽门螺杆菌感染血清微RNA表达水平及表达特征研究[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 27-31.
[12] 蒋蔚茹, 徐三荣. 要努力弄清"慢性胃炎"的临床意义[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 266-270.
[13] 高明生, 张盼盼, 包楠迪, 孟繁森, 李婷婷, 徐世平. 一种新型乳链菌素混合物体外杀灭幽门螺杆菌的实验研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 258-263.
[14] 汪颖, 李沛霖, 李泉, 狄红梅, 高昶. 呼出气一氧化氮监测诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的有效性研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 37-40.
[15] 娄伦生, 黄玉荣, 何磊, 陈冬梅, 莫国毅, 杨杰. 伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流病的疗效Meta分析[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 95-102.
阅读次数
全文


摘要