切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 62 -65. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2019.02.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

结肠镜学习时间与结肠息肉检出率关系的临床研究
苏军凯1,(), 万淑琴1, 谢雄炳1, 杨伟超1, 林炳慧1, 周剑金1   
  1. 1. 363000 漳州,福建漳州正兴医院消化内镜中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-29 出版日期:2019-05-15
  • 通信作者: 苏军凯
  • 基金资助:
    漳州市自然科学基金项目(ZZ2018J44)

Clinical Study on the Relationship Between Colonoscopy Learning Time and Polyp Detection Rate

Junkai Su1,(), Shuqin Wan1, Xiongbing Xie1, Weichao Yang1, Binghui Lin1, Jianjun Zhou1   

  1. 1. Endosocopy Center, Zhangzhou Zhengxing Hospital, Fujian 363000, China
  • Received:2019-03-29 Published:2019-05-15
  • Corresponding author: Junkai Su
  • About author:
    Correspondence author: Su Junkai, Email:
引用本文:

苏军凯, 万淑琴, 谢雄炳, 杨伟超, 林炳慧, 周剑金. 结肠镜学习时间与结肠息肉检出率关系的临床研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2019, 06(02): 62-65.

Junkai Su, Shuqin Wan, Xiongbing Xie, Weichao Yang, Binghui Lin, Jianjun Zhou. Clinical Study on the Relationship Between Colonoscopy Learning Time and Polyp Detection Rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2019, 06(02): 62-65.

目的

探讨结肠镜息肉检出率是否随着结肠镜的学习时间的增加而不断提高。

方法

回顾性分析2016年7月至2018年12月经福建漳州正兴医院4名有经验的肠镜医师A、B、C、D及2名肠镜初学者E、F每半年的结肠镜息肉检出率变化趋势,并进行分析和比较。

结果

A、B、C、D、E、F医生总的息肉检出率分别为43.8%(1 107/2 529)、31.8%(420/1 322)、35.3%(619/1 753)、25.2%(194/771)、42.8% (166/388)和29.3%(129/440)。6名肠镜医师之间、4名有经验肠镜医师之间及2名肠镜初学者之间的息肉检出率差异均具有统计学显著性差异。肠镜初学者E医生一年半时间,每半年息肉检出率分别为48.39%(15/31)、42.86%(42/98)和42.08%(109/259),而F医生仅为21.84%(19/87)、32.73%(36/110)和30.45%(74/243),检出率无明显统计学差异。

结论

结肠镜息肉检出率并不随着结肠镜的学习时间的增加而提高。

Objective

To explore whether the detection rate of colonoscopic polyps increases with the increase of learning time of colonoscopy.

Methods

The detection rates of colorectal polyps in four experienced endoscopists A, B, C, D and two colonoscopy trainees E and F, from July 2016 to December 2018, were analyzed and compared retrospectively.

Results

The detection rates of polyps in doctors A, B, C, D, E and F were 43.8%(1107/2529), 31.8%(420/1322), 35.3% (619/1753), 25.2%(194/771), 42.8%(166/388) and 29.3%(129/440), respectively.There were significant differences in the detection rates of polyps among 6 endoscopists, 4 experienced endoscopists and 2 colonoscopy trainees (all the P values were 0.000). The detection rates of polyps in colonoscopy trainees E were 48.39%(15/31), 42.86%(42/98) and 42.08%(109/259) every half year, and the data of colonoscopy trainees E were 21.84%(19/87), 32.73%(36/110) and 30.45%(74/243) respectively, which were no differences in the detection rates of polyps .

Conclusion

The detection rate of colonoscopic polyps does not increase with the learning time of colonoscopy.

图1 不同医生肠镜息肉检出率的差异
[1]
PoppersDM,CohenJ.The path to quality colonoscopy continues after graduation[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2019,89(3):493-495.
[2]
MahadevS,JinZ,LebwohlB,et al.Trainee colonoscopy quality is influenced by the independent and unobserved performance characteristics of supervising physicians[J].Endosc Int Open,2019,7(1):E74-E82.
[3]
RexDK,SchoenfeldPS,CohenJ,et al.Quality indicators for colonoscopy[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2015,110(1):72-90.
[4]
WardST,MohammedMA,WaltR,et al.An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database[J].Gut,2014,63(11):1746-1754.
[5]
Fernández-LandaMJ,AginagaldeAH,Aran A-ArriE,et al.Quality indicators and patient satisfaction in colonoscopy[J].Gastroenterol Hepatol,2019,42(2):73-81.
[6]
ShaukatA,GravelyAA,KimAS,et al.Rates of Detection of Adenoma,Sessile Serrated Adenoma,and Advanced Adenoma Are Stable Over Time and Modifiable[J].Gastroenterology,2019,156(3):816-817.
[7]
BitarH,ZiaH,BashirM,et al.Impact of fellowship training level on colonoscopy quality and efficiency metrics[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2018,88(2):378-387.
[8]
SpierBJ,BensonM,PfauPR,et al.Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships:determining competence[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2010,71(2):319-324.
[9]
WilliamsJE,HolubJL,FaigelDO.Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy:results from a national endoscopy database[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2012,75(3):576-582.
[10]
FrancisDL,Rodriguez-Correaet,DanielT,et al.Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2011,73(3):493-497.
[11]
Gohel TD,BurkeCA,LankaalaP,et al.Polypectomy rate:a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender,and endoscopist[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2014,12(7):1137-1142.
[12]
WilliamsJE,LeTD,FaigelDO.Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2011,73(3):498-506
[13]
令狐恩强,刘杰,李惠凯,等.透明帽在无痛单人肠镜操作中的作用[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志:电子版,2011,4(5):365-368.
[14]
张帅,张鸣青,苏军凯,等.透明帽在单人肠镜检查中的临床应用价值[J/CD].中华胃肠内镜电子杂志,2015,2(2):21-24.
[15]
DesaiM,Sanchez-YagueA,ChoudharyA,et al.Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and met A-analysis[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2017,86(2):274-281.
[1] 王文华, 吴周全, 恽惠方, 王志萍. 经鼻右美托咪定在老年患者无痛肠镜检查中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 344-348.
[2] 吴国刚, 冷梅, 刘兆润, 王明辉, 李博, 刘嘉文. 左半梗阻性结肠癌术中结肠镜检查的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(05): 344-346.
[3] 方红燕, 刘晓昌, 方家旭. 腹部按压联合综合护理在腹壁造口旁疝患者肠镜检查中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-629.
[4] 杨龙宝, 赵刚, 安苗, 秦赟, 薛琼, 王进海, 董蕾. 联合无痛胃肠镜检查患者的肠道准备策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 278-283.
[5] 杜志强, 徐文革, 张静, 赵伟, 罗山铖, 徐大海. 水交换结肠镜结合二氧化碳注气行结肠镜检查的临床分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2016, 05(02): 163-166.
[6] 孔绘敏, 王秀勤, 梁海. 硫酸镁钠钾口服液与复方聚乙二醇电解质散对患者肠道清洁的对比研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 259-261.
[7] 杨晓金, 李婷, 蔡波尔, 吴云林, 陈平, 杨翠萍. 五个家族性腺瘤性息肉病家系分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 220-223.
[8] 张石玉, 蒋波, 刘伟, 朱季军, 王晓燕. 不同肠道清洁度下窄带成像对升结肠息肉检出率的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 135-137.
[9] 于晓欢, 路璐, 郑权, 熊英. 结肠镜新技术对提高结直肠腺瘤性息肉检出率的影响[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 219-224.
[10] 张静洁, 江振宇, 汤泊夫, 武勇, 孟宪梅. 乙状结肠二次进镜对于腺瘤性息肉检出率影响的研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 82-85.
[11] 邵佩, 皮壮, 钟媛, 王楠, 王丽波. 注水法在婴幼儿结肠镜检查中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(01): 25-29.
[12] 葛伏林, 吴文娟, 王鸣, 徐杰, 胡倩, 董晓宇, 万军. 硫酸镁溶液不同口服方法在老年人肠道准备中的应用效果及安全性分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 68-71.
[13] 周燕, 虎金朋, 莫丽蓉, 白飞虎. 医源性结肠穿孔原因分析及处理措施[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2018, 05(02): 78-80.
阅读次数
全文


摘要