Effect of evidence-based nursing on peptic ulcer

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2020.04.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To observe the clinical effect of evidence-based nursing in peptic ulcer.

Method

217 patients with peptic ulcer were selected from January 2019 to October 2019 in the first medical center of the general hospital of the people′s liberation army. All patients were equally divided into group A and group B in order to eliminate time interference. Patients in the group A received routine nursing care. And patients in the group B received evidence based nursing measures. Finally, the nursing quality score and satisfaction of patients with peptic ulcer were statistically analyzed.

Result

The data of this study were compared and analyzed. The scores of disinfection quality, first aid quality, ward quality and overall quality in group B were significantly higher than those in group A. The satisfaction of patients with peptic ulcer in group B was 98.89%, which was significantly higher than 92.59% in group A. By P-test, χ² test and other tests, the difference between the two groups was significant.

Conclusion

Good effects of the clinical application of evidence-based nursing in digestive department would be worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Peptic ulcer, Evidence-based nursing, Observation on nursing effect

Jing Hao, Liuliu Yang, You Han, Li Dai, Bei Zhao, Shuangshuang Cheng. Effect of evidence-based nursing on peptic ulcer[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(04): 202-204.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhwcnjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2020.04.007

https://zhwcnjdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2020/V07/I04/202

Figures/Tables 2

References 10

[1]	Dadfar Aydin, Edna Tom-Harald.Epidemiology of perforating peptic ulcer: A population-based retrospective study over 40 years[J] .World J Gastroenterol，2020，26(35): 5302-5313.
[2]	Zhu Clara, Badach Jeremy, Lin Andrew, et al. Omental patch versus gastric resection for perforated gastric ulcer: Systematic review and meta-analysis for an unresolved debate[J] .Am J Surg, 2020, undefined: undefined.
[3]	Zhang SH, Zhang JH, Zhao YJ.Effect of health nursing intervention on quality of life and complications of peptic ulcer patients on the basis of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) constitution identification [J] .Minerva Med，2020，undefined: undefined.
[4]	Sayehmiri Kourosh, Abangah Ghobad, Kalvandi Gholamreza, et al. Prevalence of peptic ulcer in Iran: Systematic review and meta-analysis methods.[J] .J Res Med Sci，2018，23: 8.
[5]	黄美娜，林华琴，林艺莹．循证护理模式与传统护理模式在老年消化性溃疡合并糖尿病患者中的疗效对比观察[J]．糖尿病新世界，2020，23(13)：105-107.
[6]	周绍芸．消化性溃疡老年患者实施循证护理的临床分析[J]．中国农村卫生，2020，12(10)：25-27.
[7]	李丹．循证护理对老年消化性溃疡合并糖尿病患者血糖水平及满意度的影响[J]．糖尿病新世界，2020，23(10)：115-116，＋119.
[8]	唐韦雯．循证护理在消化性溃疡患者中的应用及临床效果分析[J/CD]．实用临床护理学电子杂志，2020，5(3)：96，102.
[9]	Chen B, Liu XY, Zhang HM, et al. Psychological effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in elderly patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A protocol of systematic review[J] .Medicine (Baltimore), 2020，99: e22226.
[10]	Gong EJ, Lee SJ, Jun BG, et al. Optimal Timing of Feeding After Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding：A Randomized，Noninferiority Trial (CRIS KCT0001019)[J]．Am J Gastroenterol，2020，115(4): 548-554.

组别	例数	消毒质量	急救质量	病区质量	整体质量
A组	108	11.12±2.33	13.05±2.10	12.93±2.21	13.00±2.23
B组	107	18.34±1.09	17.90±2.00	18.11±1.90	18.33±1.45
P值	-	0.002	0.012	<0.001	<0.001
χ²值	-	4.112	4.569	10.732	11.423
t值	-	1.372	1.122	3.112	1.212

组别	例数	消毒质量	急救质量	病区质量	整体质量
A组	108	11.12±2.33	13.05±2.10	12.93±2.21	13.00±2.23
B组	107	18.34±1.09	17.90±2.00	18.11±1.90	18.33±1.45
P值	-	0.002	0.012	<0.001	<0.001
χ²值	-	4.112	4.569	10.732	11.423
t值	-	1.372	1.122	3.112	1.212

组别	例数	满意	基本满意	不满意	总满意度
A组	108	75(69.44)	15(13.89)	8(7.41)	100(92.59)
B组	107	97(90.65)	8(7.48)	2(1.87)	105(98.89)
P值	-	0.043	0.022	<0.001	<0.001
χ²值	-	3.112	4.569	10.362	12.120
t值	-	1.216	1.329	2.112	1.212

组别	例数	满意	基本满意	不满意	总满意度
A组	108	75(69.44)	15(13.89)	8(7.41)	100(92.59)
B组	107	97(90.65)	8(7.48)	2(1.87)	105(98.89)
P值	-	0.043	0.022	<0.001	<0.001
χ²值	-	3.112	4.569	10.362	12.120
t值	-	1.216	1.329	2.112	1.212

[1]	Juan Xie, Na Li. Effect of tepretone and maizilin-S on S2 phase acquisition rate and serum factors of gastric ulcer patients with Helicobacter pylori positive [J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 607-612.
[2]	Yinya Wu, Weiping Zhang, Chaojie Zhang, Xufeng Chen. Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer syndrome: A report of 15 patients [J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 443-445.
[3]	Xiaoping Gao, Ju Wang, Hongwei Jiang, Haijun Li. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic repair of giant gastroduodenal ulcer perforation [J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 42-45.
[4]	Gang Du, Lin Yang, Le-si-ji Kang, Zhengyong Tang. Study on Minimally Invasive Surgical Repair of Patients with gastroduodenal Ulcer [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 238-241.
[5]	Yi Zhu. The clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair of perforation of gastroduodenal ulcer [J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(02): 178-180.
[6]	Shenhong Zhang, Daiying Zhang, Wenxue Deng, Ronghui Huang, Yunlei Zhang, Ruichen Liang. Effect of preoperative visit combined with evidence-based nursing on improving stress state of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 463-467.
[7]	Qing Tang, Yuan Jiang, Haixia Zhou. Effect of evidence-based clinical nursing pathway on rehabilitation outcome and satisfaction of elderly inguinal hernia patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 342-345.
[8]	Xiankui Gao, Taiyun Zhao, Xingjun Lu, Hongling Zhang, Xiuluo Fang, Bichun Yan, Yin Wang, Yongcui Wang, Miaomiao Liu, Ruonan Ran. Efficacy of endoscopic electrocoagulation and tissue glue injection in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal ulcer with bleeding [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[9]	Guojing Fu, Xinhong Li. Research progress in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer caused by fungi [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(06): 296-298.
[10]	Changchun Zheng. The clinical efficacy observation of systematic psychological intervention and drug therapy for peptic ulcer [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(04): 168-172.
[11]	Hongtao Wei, Cangjue Pubu, Yangzong Gesang, Yan Li, Wangza Yixi, Peng Li. Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal ulcer in Lhasa: clinical presentation, prognosis, and treatment outcomes [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 662-665.
[12]	Yi Zhou, Zan Li, Guobin Tang, Yuanming Li, Siqi Wei. Efficacy comparison of eprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer in the elderly [J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Research(Electronic Edition), 2022, 09(02): 40-43.
[13]	Shujie Qi, Hong Ye. Convalescent fluid with pantoprazole and thrombin in treatment of peptic ulcer with hemorrhage: clinical evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Hygiene Rescue(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(05): 281-284.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export