切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华胃肠内镜电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 186 -189. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-7157.2020.04.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠侧向发育型息肉的疗效分析
王觅柱1, 孟宪梅1, 党彤1,()   
  1. 1. 014030 包头,内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第二附属医院消化科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-20 出版日期:2020-11-15
  • 通信作者: 党彤
  • 基金资助:
    包头市医药卫生科技计划项目(WSJJ2015036)

Clinical Study of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment with lateral colorectal polyps

Mizhu Wang1, Xianmei Meng1, Tong Dang1,()   

  1. 1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College of Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014030, China
  • Received:2020-03-20 Published:2020-11-15
  • Corresponding author: Tong Dang
引用本文:

王觅柱, 孟宪梅, 党彤. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠侧向发育型息肉的疗效分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2020, 07(04): 186-189.

Mizhu Wang, Xianmei Meng, Tong Dang. Clinical Study of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment with lateral colorectal polyps[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2020, 07(04): 186-189.

目的

探讨采用内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗结直肠侧向发育型息肉的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月经内蒙古消化病研究所内镜中心行肠镜检查发现的45例结直肠侧向发育型息肉患者,应用IT刀、Hook刀行ESD治疗。将ESD成功率、剥离病变大小、手术时间、手术并发症及复发率等纳入观察范围。

结果

45例结直肠病变接受ESD,其中,2例病变黏膜下注射后病变托举差,术中剥离困难且容易出血转外科手术。术后病理证实,3例癌变且基底仍有肿瘤残留,行外科手术扩大切除。ESD成功率88.9%(40/45)。病变直径为1.5~6.3 cm,平均3.6 cm;ESD手术时间为31~125 min,平均67 min。3例术后有便血,其中1例保守治疗失败,内镜下成功电凝止血,ESD术后出血发生率7%(3/43)。4例在ESD治疗中有小穿孔,应用软组织夹成功缝合穿孔,未转开腹手术,ESD穿孔发生率为9.3%(4/43)。术后40例患者均随访,创面基本愈合,无病变残留和复发。

结论

ESD治疗结直肠侧向发育型息肉疗效可靠,能完整切除较大的病变,提供完整的病理学资料且复发率低。出血和穿孔是其主要的短期并发症。

Objective

To evalute the practical value of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treatment of lateral colorectal polyps.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 45 cases of lateral colorectal polyps found by colonoscopy in endoscopy center of Inner Mongolia institute of digestive diseases from January 2018 to December 2019. IT knife and HOOK knife were applied in the ESD treatment. ESD success rate, lesion size, operation time, complications and recurrence rate were evaluated.

Results

45 cases with colorectal lesions were enrolled in this study. ESD was given up in 2 cases of lateral colorectal polyps with non-lifting sign.3 cases had tumor residue in the wound after ESD and one receieved an additional operation after failed conservative therapy.The success rate of ESD was 88.9% (40/45). The diameters of the lesions ranged from 1.5 to 6.3 cm with mean size of 3.6 cm.The mean ESD procedure time was 67 minutes (ranged from 31 to 125 minutes).3 cases had hematochezia after ESD and one of whom failed after conservative treatment and bleeding was controlled by electrocoagulation under endoscope. The bleeding rate was 7.0%(3/43). Perforation occurred in 4 cases during the dissection of the lesions, which was typically closed with metallic endoclips without surgical treatment. The perforation rate of ESD was 9.3%(4/43). All the 40 patients were followed up after ESD, with confirmed healing of the artificial ulcer with no residue or recurrence.

Conclusions

ESD for lateral colorectal polyps is of reliable curative effect as it can not only wholly remove the lesions but also provide pathological proof for reference with low recurrence rate. Bleeding and perforation are the main short-term complications.

[1]
Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Hayashi N, et al.Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection:accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy[J].Dig Endosc,2013,25(2):107-116.
[2]
Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K, et al.Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum[J]. Endoscopy,2014,46(10):862-870.
[3]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A.Cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer Clin,2018,68(1):7-30.
[4]
Albéniz Arbizu E, Enguita Germán M.Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection is here to stay[J]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig,2020,112(3):170-171.
[5]
张菊嫦,王学青,李爱民,等.结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床病理特征和治疗方法的发展趋势分析[J].中华消化杂志,2017,37(2):88-93.
[6]
Choi IJ, Lee NR, Kim SG, et al.Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer:A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study[J].Gut Liver,2016,10(5):739-748.
[7]
叶鹏飞,刘佃温. 经内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)与黏膜切除术(EMR)治疗结直肠早期病变的临床疗效观察[J].疾病监测与控制,2017,11(8):656-657.
[8]
Hisabe T, Nagahama T, Hirai F, et al.Clinical outcomes of 200 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections[J].Dig Endosc,2012,24(Suppl 1):105-109.
[9]
Chai NL, Feng J, Li LS, et al.Effect of polyglycolic acid sheet plus esophageal stent placement in preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with earlystage esophageal cancer: A randomized,controlled trial[J].World J Gastroenterol,2018,24(9):1046-1055.
[10]
Ji, Young, Bang, et al.Selection of EMR and ESD for Laterally Spreading Lesions of the Colon[J].Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol,2018,16(4):376-385.
[11]
Ogasawara N, Yoshimine T, Noda H, et al.Clinical risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in Japanese patients[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2016,28(12): 1407-1414.
[12]
Yan J, Sinha SR, Shai F.Sa1999-use of Tranexamic Acid to Decrease Intra-Procedural Bleeding During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Submucosal Dissection[J].Gastroenterology,2018,154(6): 442-443.
[13]
Huang Y, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, et al.Risk factors for recurrence of artificialgastric ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection[J].Endoscopy,2011,43(3):236-239.
[14]
孟令宽,陈东风,傅鑫.内镜下治疗延迟性出血的相关危险因素分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2019,25(5):20-26.
[15]
Arimoto J, Higurashi T, Kato S, et al.Risk factors for post-colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) coagulation syndrome: a multicenter,prospective,observational study[J]. Endosc Int Open,2018,6(3):E342-E349.
[16]
李全林,钟芸诗,周平红,等.内镜下切除技术对食管胃连接部胃肠间质瘤的治疗价值[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(3):236-239.
[17]
刘香,万露,王晟,等.胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中使用二氧化碳注气的安全性及有效性研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(3):29-32.
[1] 姚明, 高恒飞, 陶亮, 王萌. 内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗未分化型早期胃癌疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 46-51.
[2] 陈波, 彭超, 谭小辉, 王国仲, 涂元茂. ESD治疗十二指肠非壶腹部侧向发育型肿瘤的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 222-225.
[3] 郭建强, 牛彦杰, 周斌, 王晖. 不同剥离辅助牵引技术辅助ESD治疗食道早癌的临床效果研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 628-630.
[4] 柴宁莉. 内镜黏膜下剥离术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(05): 0-0.
[5] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[6] 刘晗, 李惠, 朱宇新, 于淼, 李莞盈, 王爽, 狄育竹, 宁丹丹, 曲波. 新型生物材料在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 167-171.
[7] 陈磊, 王璐, 朱海杭, 高苏俊, 印健, 张利, 陆伟, 陈娣, 朱振. 导致食管浅表肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术困难的影响因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(06): 256-261.
[8] 倪修凡, 陈磊, 印健, 张利, 高苏俊, 朱振. 内镜下不同术式治疗直肠神经内分泌肿瘤临床研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 173-179.
[9] 曹友红, 马亦旻, 张康伟, 孔令超, 徐甜, 邢一鸣, 吕奇珠, 姜云方, 徐桂芳. 内镜下新型金属夹联合圈套器辅助内镜下黏膜切除术治疗直肠神经内分泌瘤疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 41-45.
[10] 武勇, 党彤, 孟宪梅, 江振宇, 王晶, 张静洁, 周怡, 年嫒嫒. 内蒙古包头地区神经内分泌肿瘤回顾性分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(03): 111-114.
[11] 雷甜甜, 刘家欢, 黄虹玉, 杨锦林, 马洪升. 进展期结直肠腺瘤及高危腺瘤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 61-67.
[12] 丁樑, 陈伟, 俞静华, 章粉明, 许国强. 早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术术中出血分级评估及相关因素分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(02): 51-56.
[13] 卢桂芳, 任牡丹, 严小鹏, 殷燕, 马锋, 赵倩, 卢新兰, 张志勇, 吕毅, 和水祥. 磁牵引技术辅助早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2021, 08(01): 29-32.
[14] 张文刚, 柴祎超, 刘圣圳, 令狐恩强, 柴宁莉. 磁锚定辅助牵引技术在食管早癌内镜黏膜下剥离术中应用的初步研究[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2020, 07(03): 134-136.
[15] 高勇, 樊超强, 柏健鹰. 牵引技术在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用进展[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2019, 06(04): 180-185.
阅读次数
全文


摘要